Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message originally sent by slack user U7213XMGS3H
All good food for thought
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message originally sent by slack user U7213XMGS3H
I think there are many of us looking at a 12 year+ old code base thinking “what is this going to be like in 12 years” and trying to figure out the best path forward. I think “let’s do nothing but refactoring for 24 months” will be hard to sell to the business, but doing nothing isn’t viable either, and I believe that there’s some kind of sub-optimal incremental modularization that’s possible while we still develop. Sort of like how we moved buildings while people came to work https://www.archdaily.com/973183/the-building-that-moved-how-did-they-move-an-11000-ton-telephone-exchange-without-suspending-its-operations
Message excluded from import.
Message originally sent by slack user U7213XMGS3H
hard agree
Message originally sent by slack user U7213XMGS3H
that’s why they call it tech debt. if it was 0% interest, it wouldn’t really be so bad
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message excluded from import.
Message originally sent by slack user U7213XMGS3H
right right, having no one come to work would be them taking down the app
Message excluded from import.